Friday, 17 May 2013

So motivate me...

English: Handwritten words: "Motivation &...


Understanding motivation, what stimulates you as an individual to think or behave in a particular way, is a prerequisite in effecting change in organisations. Yet extrinsic motivation (the tangible rewards such as a target bonus) is often not differentiated from intrinsic (the subtle and sometimes subliminal reward such as meaningful work or choosing your work hours). 

Naomi Stanford, who has spoken at KIN in the past on organisational change has written a blog piece on this in which she quotes Dan Pink. Pink suggests that some of the most powerful personal motivators are  "the incentives of autonomy, mastery, and purpose. Client face-time is perhaps the most coveted commodity in our business". It's interesting how far removed this is from the apparently coveted corner office as a reward.
If you would like to know more about the way extrinsic and intrinsic motivators work and build a 'high-engagement culture' along the way, I recommend reading this short article by Kenneth Thomas - The Four Intrinsic Rewards That Drive Employee Engagement. 

Yesterday I was talking to Robert Dufton, outgoing Chief Executive of the Paul Hamlyn Foundation . PHF clearly understands and delivers the intrinsic drivers that attracts the highly motivated people drawn to work in the 3rd sector. Robert was telling me how PHF went about the design their attractive new offices in Kings Cross. As well as creating a physical space that stimulated exchange of knowledge, PHF consulted staff about what extrinsic rewards they wanted. Top of the list was a proper Italian coffee machine - and excellent coffee it is too.

Gary Colet

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Tuesday, 14 May 2013

More on MOOCs

In March, I posted an item on the then relatively new phenomenon of Massively Online Open Courses or 'MOOC's. As knowledge and organisational learning professionals, I think this is something we should be taking serious notice of and asking 'what can we learn from this?'

Steve Dale, the KIN Associate for the 'Enabling Technologies' SIG has since completed a MOOC from the Coursera catalogue of courses on the topic of Social Network Analysis. Steve has very kindly shared his experience of learning in this way in a helpful blog of his own. Read about it here. Steve not only gives insight into how to make this an effective and novel way of learning and sharing knowledge, but also gives an extensive list of MOOC resources.

I will be taking a look through and signing up to a MOOC course very soon. It seems there is just about something for everyone.

Gary Colet

Photo credit and even more resources on MOOCs: http://ii.library.jhu.edu/tag/mooc/

Friday, 19 April 2013

Societal norms and flaming swords - LOL

Thought LOL stood for 'laugh out loud'? 3 million people think differently. I'll tell you why in just a moment.

I can heartily recommend this month's McKinsey Quarterly article 'Givers Take All' that empirically sets out  why organisations that encourage employees to behave more altruistically stand to gain the most. By rewarding 'givers', and screening out 'takers', organisations can reap significant and lasting benefits. 
'Evidence from studies led by Indiana University’s Philip Podsakoff demonstrates that the frequency with which employees help one another predicts sales revenues in pharmaceutical units and retail stores; creativity in consulting and engineering firms; productivity in paper mills; and revenues, operating efficiency, customer satisfaction, and performance quality in restaurants.'
The full article is available to KIN members in the Memberspace KRT Library here. 
League of Legends


The second item that caught my eye this month was an item in New Scientist magazine about how online gaming communities are moderating the malevolent language that plagues those forums. The example given was from the 'League of Legends' (LoL) fantasy from Riot Games, which has 3 million online players at any given time. What's this got to do with organisational learning? Bear with me...
'Behavioural profiles are constructed for every player in the game; the profiles measure how many times users insult teammates or opponents'. The clever part is that an MIT Game Lab system called Tribunal aggregates negative behaviour cases and bubbles them to the top, where they are presented back to the community forum. The community can then vote on whether the behaviour was acceptable or not. Particularly egregious cases can lead to a player being banned. It turns out that not only does this self-policing work in making players think about their behaviour, but it actually modifies the communities 'societal norms'.

This got me thinking about whether this community self-policing and culture-shaping technique would work for positive feedback as well as negative. If we think about behaviour being on a spectrum from selfish/unacceptable right though to selfless/altruistic, why shouldn't it? We already know that those who take the trouble to help others (as in the McKinsey article examples) stand to gain the most in the long run. If the surfacing of 'bad' behaviour for a community to judge and even impose sanctions works, the surfacing of 'exemplary' behaviour and award of rewards should also work.  

Whilst not many organisations could boast having 3 million participants in their discussion forums at any one time, I'd like to see the MIT Game Lab Tribunal technology deployed to reinforce good behaviour in one of the KIN member organisations' community forums. Any volunteers?

Image source: http://euw.leagueoflegends.com/
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, 22 March 2013

2013 - as imagined in 1968

KIN held a sold-out Masterclass on 'Knowledge Visualisation' yesterday with Lulu Pinney.
The day was a hands-on exploration of the difference that well crafted and appropriate images can make to the communication and sharing of knowledge. All too often we resort to the written word, when images can convey meaning so much better. This was proven through some fun and powerful exercises.

In the afternoon, Steve Dale, KIN Associate for Enabling Technologies briefed us on the latest developments in digital and social curation. Potentially helping us make sense and filter the onslaught of digital detritus heading our way, it seems that auto-curated content for online magazines is coming of age. As Steve puts it 'it took a while for Web 2.0 to become Enterprise 2.0, but that is where we are heading with digital curation'.

In 1968 the Los Angeles Times bravely predicted what life would be like for us 25 years hence - in 2013. The article is reproduced here.
If you take a look at page 3 (see 6:00am), it seems that their prediction for auto-curated content was amazingly acurate.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, 14 March 2013

MOOCs


Coursera Statistics One

My daughter is currently completing her geography degree  at Nottingham University. I was impressed at how much of her course material was available online, allowing her to study when suits her (ie when she gets out of bed or at 3:00am).

You may not have heard of MOOC, but Massively Open Online Courses are a phenomenon which gives everyone access to university learning, completely free.

www.coursera.org is a wonderful MOOC resource that uses this wealth of online material and offers it in the form of structured online courses, usually of 6-12 weeks. This is no second-rate resource; universities such as Stanford, Penn State, Duke, LSE and Insead all have offerings, with top course tutors and supplemented participant assignments, discussion forums and exams.

What a wonderful and novel way of sharing knowledge 'san frontiers'.

I'd like to sign-up for the Stanford University course in Organisational Analysis; I've asked if it will be re-run this year. I'm hoping that other KIN members will do it at the same time, so that we can learn together.

Coursera was kindly pointed out to me by KIN Associate Steve Dale, who has started a University of Michigan course in Organisational Network Analysis.

 (Photo credit: AJC1)

Enhanced by Zemanta